working days the journals of the grapes of wrath

And his hostess was Lady Mendl (Elsie de Wolfe), arbiter of American decorating taste over a generation. For Bemelmans was 'the man who came to cocktails'.

It's just a run-of-the-mill book.' Admirably compiled and annotated by DeMott, and a must for Steinbeck fans, this is an otherwise modest literary treat.Īn extravaganza in Bemelmans' inimitable vein, but written almost dead pan, with sly, amusing, sometimes biting undertones, breaking through. 'Did ever a book get written under such excitement,' he writes, and collapses into disappointment when finished: '.it isn't the great book I had hoped it would be. He began the journal and novel shortly after the death of his brother-in-law, was constantly bothered by loan-seekers and self-doubt, and worried over everything from Hitler's war maneuvers to the sale of his house. More compelling is Steinbeck's anxiety over external obstacles that arose during the book's five-month composition (June-October 1938), which shows him losing almost all control and confidence. They explain little about Grapes, and reinforce the impression of skeptical critics that he mechanically plodded through the novel filling average people with clichÇd speech.

Steinbeck's journal 'entries' are mostly short, rushed notes exhorting himself to finish the book. In fact, there is more spectacle than event to the finished product. It's presented here with copious critical apparatus, including introduction, commentary, critical notes, and illustrations (not seen). Editor DeMott (English/Ohio Univ.) accidentally dug up this brief manuscript material while researching another book on Steinbeck.

A pleasant trove of work notes released to coincide with the 50th anniversary of The Grapes of Wrath.

Working days the journals of the grapes of wrath